Abstract for presentation (Poster or Podium)
AI in Transportation
Keke Long, MA
Research Assistant
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madison, WI, United States
Keke Long, MA
Research Assistant
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madison, WI, United States
Haotian Shi, PhD (he/him/his)
Research Associate
UW-Madison
Madison, WI, United States
Zihao Sheng, Master
Research Assistant
University of Wisconsin, Madison
MADISON, Wisconsin, United States
Xiaopeng Li, PhD
Professor
University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States
Sikai Chen
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Keke Long, MA
Research Assistant
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madison, WI, United States
In vehicle trajectory prediction, physics models and data-driven models are two predominant methodologies. However, each approach presents its own set of challenges: physics models fall short in predictability, while data-driven models lack interpretability. Addressing these identified shortcomings, this paper proposes a novel framework, the Physics-Enhanced Residual Learning (PERL) model. PERL integrates the strengths of physics-based and data-driven methods for vehicle trajectory prediction. PERL contains a physics model and a residual learning model. Its prediction is the sum of the physics model result and a predicted residual as a correction to it. It preserves the interpretability inherent to physics-based models and has reduced data requirements compared to data-driven methods. Experiments were conducted using a real-world vehicle trajectory dataset. We proposed a PERL model, with the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) as its physics car-following model and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) as its residual learning model. We compare this PERL model with the physics car-following model, data-driven model, and other physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. The result reveals that PERL achieves better prediction with a small dataset, compared to the physics model, data-driven model, and PINN model. Second, the PERL model showed faster convergence during training, offering comparable performance with fewer training samples than the data-driven model and PINN model. Sensitivity analysis also proves comparable performance of PERL using another residual learning model and a physics car-following model.